In an earlier post I covered some examples of how “Woke” had turned into a weapon that is destroying free speech and people.

The latest example is John Kass. I’ve often referred to this long-time Chicago Tribune reporter because of his well-balanced and deeply informed views of that city and its politics. He is actually the reporter who took over from the legendary Mike Royko.
But back in late June he wrote an article for Jewish World Review, One wrong ‘like’ will get you canceled:
Michael Korenberg, the chairman of the University of British Columbia’s board of governors, was forced to resign. I don’t know his Canadian politics. But I do know his thought crime.
He was accused of having liked tweets by Dinesh D’Souza, the conservative who dares mock Black Lives Matter, and other tweets praising President Donald Trump and condemning the violent antifa movement. All Korenberg did was like them. He was denounced. He groveled. Then he was gone.
Kass had barely finished that column when he landed in exactly that sort of shit with a Trib story that covered the explosion of violent crime in Democrat-run cities across the USA.

He ignored the Mayors and their machines and looked at the DA’s and other prosecutors who are releasing criminals on to the streets, starting with Cook County’s very own state’s attorney Kimberly Foxx – already mentioned in The Chicago Way and Chicago loses against BLM – and how people like her had got elected as DA’s, starting with Foxx’s massive $2 million election support from George Soros:
“These Democratic cities are also where left-wing billionaire George Soros has spent millions of dollars to help elect liberal social justice warriors as prosecutors. He remakes the justice system in urban America, flying under the radar.
Kass had just stepped into a no-go zone that the Far Left thought it had fenced off from criticism via mockery (“a conspiracy theory”). And it was his own group that jumped him. All nine members of the Chicago Tribune Guild executive council went after him with a letter to their Tribune colleagues, and mockery was no longer sufficient:
“The odious, anti-Semitic conspiracy theory that billionaire George Soros is a puppet master controlling America’s big cities does not deserve a mainstream voice, especially at a time when hate crimes are rising…
We ask that the paper, and Kass separately, apologize for his indefensible invocation of the Soros tropes.”
Kass of course had not even mentioned that Soros was Jewish, nor did that have anything to do with the topic of Soros’s political strategies and objectives. It was basically the usual “Shut Up Racist Because Reasons“, that had already played out in the NYT. More importantly was the “odious” fact that reporters were behaving like political operatives – as indeed most of them are nowadays. As it turned out, Kass was well aware of how this bullshit game is played when he responded:
Soros’ influence on these races is undeniable and has been widely reported. But in that column, I did not mention Soros’ ethnicity or religion.
You’d think that before wildly accusing someone of fomenting bigoted conspiracy theories, journalists on the union’s executive board would at least take the time to Google the words “Soros,” “funding” and “local prosecutors.”…
I will not apologize for writing about Soros.
I will not bow to those who’ve wrongly defamed me.
I will continue writing my column.
The paper demoted him from his position as their “lead columnist”, but were so gutless that they tried to palm it off as part of an overall reorganisation.
I don’t think they fooled anybody. Especially not Slats Grobnik.
Sorry, I’m confused by this or maybe I’m overthinking it other than your point is that Kass’ career has been sidelined for saying something ideologically unsound. Ok, but
So what if George Soros spends $2, $2 million dollars, $200 million on advertising for a politician? Isn’t it right wing libertarian policy that people should be able to spend what they want, including on political advertising?
In the light of the cries “anti-semitism” against Jeremy Corbin in the last UK election (IMHO he was at worst pro-Palestinian in their “war of liberation”/conflict with Israel, not anti-Semitic which is a politically justifiable position, if not one most Brits – or Kiwis like me for instance – agree with) I’m bemused that labelling those you want to destroy as “anti-Semites” is meant to be an especially radical left vice. I think Bibi Netanyahu has made an art form of dog whistling to the usual right wing cheerleaders when anyone dares to make any criticism of him and his government’s policies.
You’re confused? Seriously?
Kass did not argue with Soro’s right to spend money on supporting candidates. He simply pointed out that he had done so for DA candidates who would act on anti-imprisonment policies, starting with not even prosecuting arrested people.
And then Kass got dumped on as an “anti-Semite”, even though he’d made no reference to Soro’s background.
You seem to be missing the point that the cries of “anti-Semite” against Kass had nothing to do with anti-Semitism. It was just another weapon at hand for the Far Left to tell somebody to shut up in criticising their polices. It could have been anything: they didn’t care.
By contrast Corbin dropped any number of comments over the years that would have been read as classic pieces of Jew-phobia had they come out of the mouth of say…. Archie Bunker. My fave of Corbin’s was always the casual aside about how British Jews had “no sense of irony” despite “having lived in this country for a very long time”.
Still, like Archie, he was of a previous generation. 😉
No, I get that about Kass and his accusers.
But as per my first go, I’m bemused that character-assassination via the accusation of “anti-Semite” is being presented by you as an especially radical left vice. Just ask anyone in the current Likud-inspired climate who dares to criticise Netanyahu’s annexation policies. “You can criticise Israel without being an anti-Semite”? Nope, not buying it anymore in the current hard-ball environment. And not after observing the fallout NZ took both externally and internally for UNSC2334.
Not trying to threadjack, but as with Soros donating to anyone (and again, don’t right wing libertarians usually argue that advertising money doesn’t necessarily buy an election?!), I’m seeing why there is a case, albeit tenuous, and unconvincing against Kass. Especially as, irrespective of mentioning his ethnic background, Soros IS the target of anti-Semitic plot theories. And presented as a bogeyman of the radical left trying to undermine America…in the same way Lenin in Trotsky were.
Yeah, sure, you should be able to mention “the facts” about any big-spending political donor who just happens to be Jewish, just as you should be able to discuss national Immigration policy without it becoming racist. And then you realise you are living in the real world.
Personally, no matter what he said, Corbin was going to be unacceptable to those who were pro-Israeli, including and especially much of the British Jewish community who have a long historical connection with Labour. Which is their democratic prerogative, including how they sidelined him as a political player. And no, I’m not defending the genuine elements of anti-Semitic rhetoric that did attach itself to British Labour from radical left misanthropes unable to disengage that from legitimate criticism of or opposition to the Jewish state.
So, no, sorry, right wingers have been playing the “anti-Semitism!” card for quite some time, so what goes around comes around. Like plenty of others before, Kass would appear to be ideological collateral damage.
Then you seriously mis-understand my presentation of the radical left vices in this story. The “anti-Semitism” is not the point: it could have been anything, any “ism”. Anything to make Kass shut up about criticising the Left-Wing policies of the Cook County DA and her supporters – and other DA’s.
Unlike your arguments about Israel this one really was nothing to do with anti-Semitism. That’s the whole point of Woke Politics: any weapon to hand.
Ok. Yes, that’s a given, as the ideology is about power rather than “objective” truth. So I didn’t see the wood for the trees and was confused by ideological opponents using the same tactics when it suits their purposes. Denying an enemy natural justice and destroying them by slander is a vice rooted in human nature, and one that Classical Liberalism tries and lift us above, albeit imperfectly. Whereas Radical Critical Theory deliberately embraces the vice, while professing otherwise.
And Ellen DeGeneres would have sufficed for a better-known example, and for doing something even more petty, yet ideologically heretical, dining with W. 😂
Yeah – I must admit I feel sorry for DeGeneres, even though the stories of her being a nasy piece of work to the hirelings is apparently true and not unexpected for such “stars”.
I guess I’m still stuck on how much she enjoyed doing the voice for Dory in Finding Nemo.
Speaking of which, it’s time to settle down for a classic Jimmy Stewart Western: The Far Country. Complete with 10-round Winchester lever-action repeating rifles that are banned now. At least in New Zealand. 😃😃😃