The fact that the supposed Blue Tsunami of a Democrat landslide actually turned into a Red Tide, plus another huge failure in US polling and MSM coverage, are subjects worthy of separate posts.
As are the factors behind the Presidential Race itself, and what’s likely to happen (and not happen) in a Biden Administration. In saying that I should note that Al Gore was given 37 days to explore his legal options in 2000, without any MSM screaming about how he should concede, or that Democrat Stacey Abrams spent two years saying the Georgia Governor’s election was fraudulent and stolen from her in 2018, with nary a scoff from the MSM.
But there were three other election outcomes that came as a pleasing surprise, both because of the merits of each case and perhaps more importantly the location of the voters who decided them – in California and Illinois.
I’ve long held that California increasingly resembles a failing state due to all sorts of fundamental problems with road, water, and power infrastructure, taxes, homelessness, illegal immigrants, welfare and the general craziness that attends any One Party State. A place held up only by Silicon Valley but at the price of increasingly looking like a feudal kingdom, with a thin upper crust of incredibly wealthy people, a vast pool of the underclass, and the Middle Class fleeing to neighbouring states – and unfortunately taking with them the same voting habits that created the conditions driving them away.
Illinois is where California is headed, simply because it doesn’t have a Silicon Valley. It is the first US state to have its bonds officially rated as junk. Its prime city, Chicago, is in even worse shape than Illinois.
So the idea that anything sensible could emerge from these two states has seemed increasingly unlikely as the years passed, and recent policy initiatives from them seemed like just another pile of insanity.
California – AB5
First up was California’s AB5 legislation, which requires Uber, Lyft and other kinds of “gig economy” workers to be classified as employees rather than independent contractors. Now I have issues with the gig economy, given how fragile it can be and the lack of protection of workers rights. But simply shutting it down was a move of incredibly stupid, callous brutality. And predictably such a crude rule affected far more than the targets of the taxicab union’s wrath. For example it screwed the MSM in California by limiting the number of articles a freelance journalist could write at 35 per year.
Hilariously, one of these outfits, Vox Media, held out by the likes of Obama as a shining example of the new, Super-Smart media, and which had championed the law, then announced hundreds of layoffs before it went into effect in January 1, 2020. Vox employees were not the only ones to suffer; immediately, independent contractors and freelancers across many industries – catering, entertaining, media, trucking, construction, etc. – became unemployed and had their contracts terminated by companies who ceased business operations in California. People’s jobs and incomes were destroyed overnight – with nothing to replace them. The bill’s author, California Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, got it in the neck from hundreds of those people – and with all the hubris and arrogance that compiles from a One Party State – told them to suck it up. Uber and Lyft decided to fight it in the courts, and lost.
Worse yet, moves were afoot to take this idea national as Democrats in Washington D.C. crafted a Federal version of the law. Bear in mind that 57 million Americans partake in freelancing. These 57 million Americans contribute $1 trillion to the economy, or the equivalent of 5% of the U.S. GDP. These 57 million Americans are making freelancing a viable longterm career choice, pushing advanced skills, believe workplace freedom awards them more flexibility.
Fortunately opponents were able to put up measure on the ballot for this year’s election that would gut AB5. Given the mad ideas passed by California I expected the measure to be rejected and the law to continue. Amazingly it won, with 58% of the voters approving the measure. AB5 is dead – for the moment.
One more note is that the gig economy mostly consists of Millennials and younger Americans and it seems that despite complaints about it, including many specific complaints by Uber drivers themselves about Uber, they also weren’t that keen on returning to an ancient, mythical past of union membership, protection and control. So much for the idea that the Left understands the “Youf” and their future.
California – Proposition 16
Far worse in my opinion was this legislation. Years ago, California voters passed Proposition 209, a law that would prohibit race-based university admissions, public hiring, and public contracting. That’s a good thing right? We’ve all grown up hearing endless paens from the Left about how terrible racial discrimination is, especially when it has practical consequences around jobs and education.
Well that was then and this is now, with today’s Democrats having absorbed huge doses of Critical Race Theory and thus believing in “Systemic Racism”, with one solution being “positive” racial discriminaton. Thus was born Proposition 16, which would roll back Prop 209’s rules and allow racial discrimination to be practiced by state and local government in California.
Prop. 16’s proponents claimed that race-based favouritism is needed to promote “diversity,” but it is increasingly clear that what is really desired is a simple racial spoils system. I’d like to know what some benchmarks could be for achieving diversity, because in many ways the USA is already there. Consider this recent data from the U.S. Department of Education: it shows that the proportion of Black and Hispanic women enrolled in college is now higher than white males:

Amazingly, this piece of shit law also went down to defeat. Multiple polls showed that the very groups it was supposed to help, like Hispanic voters, could not stand the idea, and Asian-Americans clearly saw that it was aimed at screwing their kids.
Note that Biden won California by the usual overwhelming margin that accrues to Democrats there. So the loss of AB5 and Prop 16 is a marker that even California Democrats have limits to their own party’s bullshit.
Illinois – Progressive Income Tax Scheme
Finally we come to my personal favourite. Rather than tackling the myriad financial problems of the state and Chicago, the billionaire Governor, Pritzker, decided that the answer was to gouge more money out of the state taxpayers, an estimated $4 billion. And he devoted millions out of his own pocket to win.
It was a bold exercise since the state’s flat income tax was written into the state constitution. Politicians have long been able to change the rate, and they have, with it rising from 3% during my time there, to 5%. But it was recognised that there were limits to this and Pritzker’s idea was to have a graduated, progressive scheme like that of most nations, with different income tax rates for different income levels.
As in California, Illinois is a One Party State. The last GOP governor (2015-2019) could get nothing done in the face of opposition from the real power in the state, Michael Madigan, Speaker of the Illinois House for thirty years and more. So they felt arrogant enough to change the constitution.
They failed. The measure was overwhelmingly defeated in the election, even as the voters returned Democrats to their usual positions of permanent power in the state.
There were two reasons for this loss.
First, of the $4 billion expected windfall, Pritzker and company were willing to apply only about $100 million to dealing with the financial problems, which are mainly caused by the terrible situation of unfunded liabilities for Illinois and Chicago pension funds. No, the vast majority of the money was going to go to expanding old state programs and adding new ones. Pension reform was off the table, as usual, as well as any other meaningful reforms. It was an insult to the voters.
Second was the sheer emotional reaction to handing over more money to politicians already knee deep in corruption. Given the past I’ve no confidence that the current FBI investigation into Madigan – for getting ComEd, the state’s major power company, to hire some of his supporters in return for favors – will result in any meaningful change. At best it’ll be plea bargains and him stepping down, but with cronies lined up to do the same in his place while he exerts control over them. Pritzker himself has become a byword for tax avoidance. He’s also under investigation for trying to avoid taxes on a Chicago mansion he owned by making its bathrooms inoperable. His substantial offshore trusts have not paid Illinois taxes. He also inherited his money and was not even trusted to run the major businesses of his own family.
So what now? The flat tax could be raised but that’s going to hurt, and of course it won’t solve the pension problems. The Democrat machine has finally, reluctantly, started talking about “painful” budget cuts, but I suspect they’re hoping to make things so awful via petty things that voters will yield to some new version of the tax scheme. In any case, while there are thousands of state and city government workers who have been getting paid to sit at home during the Covid-19 scare, and who could be cut in theory, it still would not change the fundamental, structural spending problems that exist outside of the operating budget.
And those problems are the result of a corruption far deeper and more subtle than mere wads of cash being thrown across a table. Illinois public-sector unions support the Democratic Party in return for the party giving them sweetheart deals with the state – all perfectly legal. Unfunded pension liabilities are the consequence because many politicians hope to retire or move on to the federal level before the full bill comes due. Those liabilities also mean the schools, police, fire and other services get screwed in spending on what should be their core missions.
==================
While it’s pleasing that Californian and Illinois voters have put a dent in these plans, sadly that’s all they’ve done.
They re-elected the same Democrats.
If Trump had dealt with the voting issues in the same way as Gore, Trump would probably not have the reaction he now has. Instead all he is doing is screaming about stolen elections, massive cheating and basically trying to undermine the integrity of the election.
But hey, he is your hero and apparently can do nothing wrong.
The issue in Florida in 2000, as you surely must know, was whether the intention of voters could be discerned from the ballots cast (the hanging chad issue). There were no accusations of widespread cheating or anything like that.
I think Trump will come to his senses, and that he will find some way to concede that in his mind does not make him a loser. I expect that to happen within the next two weeks, when the threadbare nature of the legal challenges become obvious.
At this point Dr Mapp, the time I am writing this comment that is, Joe Biden has not “won the election”
Strange as it may seem to you the results are not called by the Media but by the Secretary of State for each State and that has yet to occur for the so called “Battle ground States”
And as for the integrityof this election being undermined by Donald Trump – that is hilarious when you consider how many dead people voted and other such anamolies
This isn’t the first time an American Presidential Election has been stolen either – JFK famously stole the 1960 election from Nixon.
This election is being decided in five American cities Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Pittsburgh in precincts where the voter turnout has been as high as 200% of registered voters compared to the national average of 65%.
Strange times we live in
While the Democrats and their MSM operatives with bylines are yours.
In any case I’d be quite happy to list Trumps many faults if you’re willing to list John Key’s.
Silence on that I’d bet, and no more talk of heroes who can do no wrong.
And of course I note that as an obsessive it’s you who ignores everything else about this post to pick on a single sentence about Trump.
To be honest I am not that interested in the detail of the post about the various propositions.
But I am interested in the Presidential election,. Even if it was just one sentence, it is a sentence of a lot of consequence. It implies you have bought into his argument that he not lost the election.
Well in that case you should have waited for a post on that subject. I would have thought these three state-level results would be of great interest to anybody interested in US politics, given the implications of them for the national stage.
Tom, I’m pleased you could find a sliver of comfort in what otherwise must be a long, dark night for your soul.
Al Gore had every right to question the result in Florida as he had very specific instances; he didn’t just fling dung and hope some would stick. Trump is throwing out stuff like a mad woman’s shit, and without about as much substance.
Maybe your next post could address the substance of the Orange Cheeto’s claims, but I think that may a bridge too far even for your hyper partisanship.
Meanwhile, I still have to live among the 67% of deplorables in La Paz county, but take solace that enough of us voted to tip the assigned Republican out and elect a Democrat Senator. Kelly is the husband of Gabby Giffords. Ah, the irony, Trump spent so much time abusing the Republican Senator John McCain, that McCain’s replacement is now a Democrat war hero.
A sidebar on the supposed “cheating” – don’t you think it would have been better for the Dems to have “cheated” and “stolen” the Senate, after all, with control of Congress, The President isn’t much more than a symbol.
And to add, if this ever sees the light of day – unlike you gun shy Kiwis, Arizona voted 60% Yes for Proposition 207: Legalize Marijuana.
We’re all in the streets singing our new State Song.
I love it, Anne. Obviously, you are aware of the song’s meaning. 🙂
Well nobody would be overly surprised if Arizona became part of Mexico again when the USA implodes.
Can Texas maintain itself as a republic or will it too return to Mexico?
…the supposed Blue Tsunami of a Democrat landslide actually turned into a Red Tide…
Biden’s on track to get 306 Electoral College votes, which according to Trump in 2016 constitutes a “landslide victory.” Still, a landslide is not a tsunami, I’ll grant you that.
The level of support for Trump was kind of surprising, but I think we all do the USA the courtesy of underestimating just how much enthusiasm there is for right-wing authoritarianism outside of its main centres. On the plus side, if anyone was under any illusion that conservative authoritarian demagogues like Erdogan, Modi or Bolonaro could get little traction in a liberal democracy, rural America has turned out in their tens of millions to dispel that illusion.
I’ve long held that California increasingly resembles a failing state…
The USA consists of more than just California, you know. I expect it will look a bit less like a failing state in a year or two, though.
just how much enthusiasm there is for right-wing authoritarianism outside of its main centres….rural America has turned out in their tens of millions
Yes, yes, yes. Your own bigotries to the fore, with the rural-urban divide of ancient Greece alive and well in the 21st century. Massey’s Cossacks and all.
In fact, as you well know from your comments about the big Trans shit-fights going on, among other things, and as testified to by more than few Left-wing academics, journalists, and commentators, much of the nastiest authoritarianism of today is coming precisely from the Left-wing groups huddled in those wonderful “main centres”, with their urban political, academic, journalistic and tech classes eager to treat Nineteen Eighty Four as a How-To manual rather than as a warning.
And as far as Trump is concerned, while he certainly has an authoritarian streak about him I’ve yet to see him launch the sort of wars that Bush and Obama did, let alone spy on journalists as Obama did, or pass an executive order that he himself had said was unconstitutional.
…I should note that Al Gore was given 37 days to explore his legal options in 2000…
In a situation that involved only hundreds of votes being disputed, and in which Gore didn’t have his team out peddling lies and conspiracy theories, and in which Gore hadn’t spent months trying to undermine the credibility of the electoral process. Those things might help account for the difference.
The reason that there was “nary a scoff” from the media was because the election was rigged in Georgia 2018.
There is a long and sordid history of voter suppresion in that state going back a century.
As a student of US politics it surprises me that you even tried to use that as a stick to beat the Dems.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/26/georgia-voter-suppression-black-turnout-432405
As usual the cry of “voter suppression” is merely the US Left’s way of saying that there is not voter fraud – except the fraud committed by Republicans, all wrapped up in a two-word soundbite.
I wasted my time reading the link and discovered the usual modern journalistic tricks:
the title is an attention grabbing device since in only two parts did the article actually make any “analysis” of voter suppression and neither was convincing since it referred to “perceived” voter suppression based on long lines and wait times at some voting booths; “It is a form of voter suppression to massively underfund and understaff and [under]prepare for the turnout that we have.” One could make the same comment about the inability to deal with mail-in ballots in other states if one wanted to push such a weak argument.
BTW, the “long and sordid history of voter suppression in that state” refers to the century during which Republicans didn’t get a look in and, as with other Southern States, a so-called Yellow Dog would win the Democrat seat.