
What a surprise, given history:
In his drive to conquer China, Mao Zedong and his most famous general, Lin Biao, stoked “a peasant revolution” that eventually overwhelmed the cities. In those days, most Chinese toiled on the land, a vast manpower reservoir for the Communist insurgency. Today, in a world where a majority lives in urban settlements, such a strategy would be doomed to failure.
The small percentage of rural and small-town residents in most advanced countries — generally under 20 percent — lack the numbers to overwhelm the rest of society. Political and economic elites feel free to ignore the countryside, but they may find they do so at their peril. Although now a mere slice of the population, rural areas remain critical suppliers of food, fiber (like cotton), and energy to the rest of the economy.
Residents in agricultural areas have good reason to feel put upon. Their industries are often targeted by regulators and disdained by the metropolitan cognoscenti. They may not be hiding in the caves of Yan’an, but farming communities from the Netherlands to North America are rebelling against extreme government regulations, such as banning or restricting critical fertilizers or the enforced culling of herds. Meat and dairy producers are assaulted in a hysterical article in the New York Times that predicts imminent “mass extinction” caused by humans and suggests that to keep the planet from “frying” we will need to reduce meat and dairy consumption in short order.
Regardless, the inhabitants of the periphery — the vast area from the metropolitan fringe to the deepest countryside — and the farming that flourishes there will face an extraordinarily well-funded green movement that is now depicting “industrial farming” as one of the principal villains in their ever-expanding climate melodrama. Although greens may support the notion of small farmers using artisanal methods, and the wealthy certainly can afford the much higher food prices, niche farming cannot support most farming communities or provide ordinary consumers with reasonably priced groceries.
The only good news out of this bullshit – in the Leninist sense of “The worse, the better” – is that it kills the New Zealand economy – unless our Leftists can come up with brilliant alternatives that really boost our GDP.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
=============
See also:
Radical Emptiness (esp. Sri Lanka)
Masters of the Universe (and their plans for us)
The Future’s so Bright we have to wear WEF
Do you need an NKVD for this? (from which, the following)
Have you tried to buy eggs recently?
They are the “canary in the coal mine” as what happens when Government regulates how food is to be produced.
I had to buy 10 ungraded (small) eggs, that being the only available option, for the same price I could obtain 2 dozen grade 7 eggs this time last year
The sheer openness of 1/ the plan to destroy food production, 2/ the plan to destroy civil society by atomising the populace into identity groups and 3/ the complete disdain from the ruling class towards anyone who actual produces goods and services – is to mind blowing.
They know we know they want to destroy law and enslave us, we know they know we know….. and still it continues with no pushback.
I can only see this descending to a mass outbreak of violence, its been simmering in working class populations in Europe for a few decades now as they see their way of life disparaged and destroyed. I wonder what the spark will be?
De-growth communism:
As always.
Tom – The Left is quite frankly insane. If Greens in particular think that reverting to feudal agrarianism is the answer, well they have a solution. Join the Amish or revert to 1960/70’s style Hippie communes and self limit themselves.
They wont because at their heart all of the left, Greens included, are all about control.
Environmentalism and its extension of Climate Changeism are just different methods for rabble rousing replacing the failed Class Struggle method. Climate Change is a perfect stalking Horse with is doomsday forecasts and the follow on There Is No Alternative justification for radical social & economic change. Scare or enrage the youth and radicalise them is a time honoured revolution tactic to create dangerous zealots – I give you Antifa as an example….
The world is not ending. Climate has changed for ever, with it precipitation patterns and seas level change. Human response has always been Adaptation. That is the correct response now.
By all means reduce greenhouse gas emissions over time – its a valid risk mitigation in case the current climate change theories are correct or partially correct (they are just theories and the models constructed on those theories haven’t been very accurate so far…).
But crashing the worlds economies will be disastrous for the worlds poor and vulnerable. The current estimates of the increased deaths from disease and starvation due to disruption caused by the COVID lockdown lunacy are not pretty reading unless you a dyed in the wool Malthusian (weren’t Bill Gates parents big on Malthus and population control??)
Technology advancement via well regulated Capitalism is the solution.
Longer term (100 years event horizon) extractive industry can move off planet via mining asteroid belt and using the Moon and space stations as processing areas, saving the planets environment.
In the interim, enriching the populations of SE Asia, Africa and South America will bring more benefit via the historical fact of declining birth rates in wealthy populations which will relieve pressure on the environment, plus freeing people from daily struggle leads them to be more concerned with the enviornment they live in…
Increasing wealth LEADS to better environmental outcomes… its a know linkage.
The Left are insane and purveyors of a Death Cult.
And sitting behind them pulling the strings and paying the NGO’s bills are some serious Bond style villain types hoping to install the old Left Utopian dream of Philosopher Kings (i.e. our friendly Tech Billionaires and friends) as the rulers of everything with no rights for the common people.
They are to be resisted