“Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.” – Robert Heinlein
But it is, and the fundamental reason for that is not, as the Left claim, that the Right is filled with “science deniers”, but because dealing with Climate Change offers the ultimate lefty wet dream of the State controlling our lives in at least as intimate detail as the old Soviets.
We’ve seen it with the Greens for two decades: there’s a reason that old Soviets like Keith Locke and Maoists like Sue Bradford joined and although they’re long gone the new breed like Marama Davidson and Elizabeth Kerekere are just cloaked in the 21st century Far Left bullshit of Identity Politics and the like that contain the same old oppressed/oppressor and State Control dynamic. And here’s another classic example of it from Norway:
Her name is Agnes Walton, and in her environmental fanaticism she makes Greta Thunberg look half-hearted and Al Gore look irresolute. Let’s start with her 2017 video for HBO’s VICE News Tonight, in which she noted that “more than half of all consumer goods” contain palm oil
…
Or check out Walton’s video editorial from August of last year. In this one, produced for the New York Times, Walton warned of another existential dilemma: American lawns, which, she solemnly asserted, “are damaging our planet, ruining our health, and wasting our time.” … Walton charged that American’s “obsession” with lawns “has its roots in the manicured lawns of the European aristocracy”
She must loathe golf – and she’s not even a Zoomer. But here’s her family background:
Born and raised in Norway, she’s (surprise!) a daughter of privilege – specifically, the daughter of Stephen J. Walton, a professor of languages who splits his time between Norway and the U.K. and who, in a 2012 profile for the scholarly journal Kjønnsforskning (Gender Research), explained that he and his wife live apart so that he can have sex with men. He contributes a column on feminism to Klassekampen, Norway’s self-described “revolutionary socialist” newspaper, and has written a book deploring the “Americanization” of Norway…. Oh, one more thing: his son, Agnes’s brother, is an ardent Communist.
What are the odds that she’s into Friedmanite economics rather than Karl Marx?
…having studied French at the University of Oslo, political science in Sweden, and environmental science at Yale, has had a busy transatlantic career, working (just like Dad) as a Klassekampen columnist and as communications manager for a Swedish commission on “food, planet, [and] health” before becoming, as we’ve seen, a “climate researcher” for VICE News in New York and, then, a “senior video journalist” at the Times.
Exactly the sort of person who’d tell a mere pleb with a Science degree that they don’t understand the science.
Part of that is the standard Lefty belief that the private sector couldn’t solve this problem even if it wanted to. The claim often made in the last twenty years was that capitalism created this problem so how could they solve it? Of course outside of the fringe of Communist True Believers even the Left understand that capitalist institutions are the only ones that can fix this problem – but the theory is that the State can “guide” them in the desired direction via regulation. That such regulation would have to be of Gosplan detail either escapes them or they don’t care.
Even the marginally capitalist ideas of Carbon taxes and ETS-type schemes where Carbon Credits are traded is an artificial crock since the objects of the markets are artificial creations of the State and deliberately subject to their price being lifted by regulation. Think minimum wage or rent control but more stupid.
As an example of where this artificiality will eventually lead see the latest screwup in Britain where the Tory government’s offer of permits for offshore wind farms saw not a single bid made by the private sector companies, who then informed the Tories that their regulator would have to allow power price increases of at least 70% if the bids were to be profitable.
That’s not a marketplace, let alone a free one.
But if you’re incredibly wealthy you can stay ahead of the insanity – for a while. Like California, who at present have a small project going (costing mere billions of dollars) to remove four hydroelectric dams built a century ago:
The first of four hydroelectric dams along the Oregon-California border has been removed from the main stem of the Klamath River. All that remains of the dam known as Copco 2 in Siskiyou County, California, is the headworks of a diversion tunnel adjacent to the now free-flowing river.
…
When complete, the overall project will be the biggest dam removal in U.S. history and will reopen 400 miles of fish habitat that was cut off for more than a century.
That’s nice. And that steady flow of hydro electricity will be replaced by what? Wind? Solar? Unicorn farts? BTW, the second biggest dam removal did not bring back the Coho salmon.
If the mentality exists that can destroy something as embedded, both physically and systemically in our society as a hydro dam, you can see how easily they’ll kick farming to the curb:

Those are Indian farmers protesting but those signs are right on the button as a clear sign that this Climate-Change-mitigation-anti-farmer crap is global despite all the international treaties saying that such measures should not negatively affect food production:
Since provisions of the Green New Deal were included in the “Inflation Reduction Act,” the Biden administration has gone full bore into regulatory rule-making. Rule-making is surreptitiously powerful and generally goes ignored by any media, since few journalists have done time in the real world of actual production of actual goods that people need to eat.
But that rule-making is now methodically shuttering independent farmer after rancher after farmer. Ranches that have fed people for a century or more are having their herds reduced from six hundred head of cattle to one hundred, without any ability to discuss or work with the Bureau of Land Management official who is ruining them. A proposed new rule gives Bureau of Land Management employees even more power, without any legislative oversight.
The GOP morons who voted for this still have not got the message of how broad legal Acts get turned by their Lefty enemies into business-killing “regulations” wielded by asshole bureaucrats.
The Epoch Times has just released a film called, No Farmers, No Food. An hour-long documentary that shows just how far along the Net Zero 2030 food rules have progressed. The program shows the stories of the Dutch farmers, the Sri Lankan disaster where the withdrawal of fertilizer meant starvation, and the literal crimes taking place out in the heartlands and rangelands of America.
These people, these Leftists, for all their crying about how much they care about humans and human society, are lying in the same way that they lied about caring about South Africa or now about Palestine or … well, pick any issue they’ve pushed over the last few decades. Agnes Walton is John Minto is Marama Davidson is Elizabeth Kerekere is…
They hate our society and wish to destroy it. That’s the real reason they’re hot on Climate Change. Science has nothing to do with it.
Tom, I am at a loss to understand many on this site who think global warming isn’t happening. Which part of the chain of logic is wrong? Is it that co2 concentrations in the atmosphere haven’t increased from 280 ppm preindustrial times to 420ppm now? Or is it that the increase hasn’t been caused by the burning of fossil fuel?. Or do they think that co2 at 0.04% doesn’t have a warming effect by decreasing the amount of heat radiated back into space?
I can’t speak for others but I don’t have a problem with that science and never have had, since I did a science degree and being keen on astronomy discovered what the Greenhouse Gas Effect was via reading about the planet Venus decades ago.
What I do have a problem with is the following.
First, the confidence in the models’ forecasting global temperature increases of 5-6 degrees by 2100, especially when the IPCC has already scaled them back in AR5 to 3-4 I think, and with further reductions likely coming due to the ludicrous economic/industrial development model input to them, being the RCP8.5 model firmly rooted in 1990 assumptions, finally being dumped by the IPCC in AR6. It predicted a 2050 global population of 15 billion, something demographers knew was crap by 2000, and it predicted an increase in coal usage of 800% in the 21st century from 1990 levels.
Second, the predictions of “global boiling” (from the idiot UN Chief no less) or other catastrophes arising from a temperature increase. I’ve yet to see any of these catastrophists refuse a chance to live in Martha’s Vineyard.
Third, the demand for drastic changes to energy and food production rather than mitigation efforts (e.g. rich countries cope better with natural disasters).
And in fact it’s that last that this post is about, so why did you hive off on to the “Global Warming Denier” debate track?
Perhaps you should be writing a comment addressing the issues raised in this post, such as whether the things I’ve outlined are sensible or even scientific ways of dealing with Climate Change?
I am at a loss to understand why anyone believes an increase in a gas essential for life on earth is an existential threat, and why anyone would give any credibility to “climate scientists”whose every single prediction for the past 50 years has been wrong. Cast your mind back to the 1970s and recall the predictions of a new ice age that were popular then.
Ok Ian I’ll bite.
There is no proof there is a link between CO2 and global warming. In fact there is no proof global warming is even happening. The only ‘proof’ is the global warming models – all based on assumptions- that do not match reality.
Even the UN sec gen has admitted there’s been a “20 year pause”.
We know CO2 is a life gas and has been far higher concentrations in the past – but has followed warming, not preceded or caused it.
We know sea surface temperatures have a significant impact on weather. El Niño and La Niña are felt worldwide. Yet we do not know for sure what drives them. The latest science points to the majority of pelagic warming (where the warmer or cooler water comes from before it hits the American coastline and streams back across the pacific) is geothermal. We have recently seen evidence of this with a speeding up of the earth’s rotation, the North Pole changing direction, due to ferrous magma leaving the mantle and going back into the core, coinciding with a long period of La Niña sea temperatures.
Global warming is a political reality, not a scientific reality.
You’re probably old enough to remember this…