When it comes to the last few decades of people sticking it to Western Culture – less our flawed institutions than the underlying philosophies that have created our systems of government, law and order, science and technology, economies and our overall civil society – I’ve moved from raised eyebrows to irritation to annoyed dismissiveness of their bullshit:

NZ prefers to see itself “of the North” rather than of the South. You can make of that what you will but I see a hint of racism and cultural superiority in that attitude, and I do not think that I am alone in that belief given the actions of certain NZ elites towards matters “of the South” such as indigenous rights and representation.

Especially because the implication is always that Western culture is no better than other cultures, which is the whole underpinning claim of multiculturalism, and often because the critics live in the West and show no desire to move to the societies they extoll.

I thought of this as I read through a “Woman Of The Day” post from Ele’s HomePaddock blog about Australian Army nursing sister Betty Jeffrey and her imprisonment by the Japanese in WWII. You can read the whole story at the link but I wanted to focus on this part:

Conditions were appalling: bug-infested rice (one tablespoon of boiled rice each per day), rotten vegetables, plus a tiny pannikin of foetid water as the daily diet yet they were made to walk for hours to fetch clean water for the guards’ sweet potato crops.

Most of the nurses had only the clothes they stood up in. No shoes; they’d taken those off before diving off the Viner Brooke. For punishment, they were made to stand for long periods in the blistering sun. At great personal risk, Betty kept a secret diary and she recorded it all. She took her life in her hands – the Japanese confiscated and destroyed all records such as birth or marriage certificates, lists of names, anything written.

They even removed the hands from the women’s watches so they couldn’t tell the time. The only reliable indicator of time passing was the rigid, monotonous camp regime with its calls of Tenkō (転向, literally changing direction, meaning coerced ideological conversion), used as a roll call requiring the women to bow in obeisance to the Japanese emperor.

She nursed women as best she could with no resources – those Red Cross parcels containing food and medical supplies were withheld from the POWs – and dug their graves when they died. Eight of her nursing colleagues were among those who didn’t survive.

Bear in mind that one of the key rationales for the terrible treatment of Allied POW’s was that the Japanese had no regard for soldiers who surrendered; like the Japanese themselves they should have fought to the death. To be fair, they showed this was not a double standard as they did die for their Emperor in vast numbers, and as the Pacific War ground on, increasingly did so in useless, hopeless ways that changed the course of battles and the war not at all, and in some cases they didn’t surrender for years after the war was over.

But these were non-combatants, in many cases civilians, as had been the Chinese victims of the IJA in the infamous Rape of Nanking, and millions of other civilians across SouthEast Asia and the Pacific.

In other words the surrender claim was merely a rationale applied to combat when the truth lay deeper in Japanese culture and society. A truth that they regarded their culture and their race as so superior that they could just do whatever they wanted with a defeated enemy.

By contrast there’s this picture of an American soldier on the island of Okinawa feeding water to a terrified little Japanese kid who is shaking from fear, cold, and hunger.

That still is from the following video, which is teed up to run at 2:43, but just drag the tracker to zero if you want to see the whole thing showing what the US Marines and Army soldiers were dealing with on Okinawa in 1945.

Also this photo of two US Marines lying asleep in a foxhole protecting a little Japanese boy between them.

Anybody who has read anything about the Pacific War or seen films or the fantastic but brutal TV miniseries, The Pacific, will know that American Marines and Soldiers committed war crimes against Japanese soldiers and the Battle of Okinawa was one of the most terrible of the war.

Yet even after being exposed to that face-to-face brutality for months in horrific conditions, with all the fear and anger and hatred of fighting an enemy who did not abide by almost any laws of war and would not surrender, even unto death, there were American soldiers who afterwards acted towards Japanese civilians in the manner of the man in that photo.

That is Western Civilisation, Western society, in a nutshell, and yes I do think it was superior to Japanese society and remains superior to many others around the world to this day. And yes, I say that knowing that the Japanese were merely being rational in using their self-sacrifice, their own mass death and refusal to surrender on Okinawa to convince the Americans not to invade Japan.

They convinced them.