Well, Europe anyway, and while being ignored or actively defended by TPTB:
- More Unknown assailants are plaguing Sweden with a series of bomb attacks. There have been 27 bombings in the first 27 days of the year. Sixty bombings in the past two months.
- How Sweden went from being the lowest crime country in Europe to being the “Rape Capital of Europe” – in less than 10 years.
- Over 50.000 reported rapes in just 6 years.
- 63% of convicted rapists have a foreign background or parents with foreign background.
- 68.000 women are genitally mutilated.
- France arrests three more men in connection with an Islamic Jihadist stabbing attack.
- While focussing on the Rudakubana stabbing murders of those three little girls, Mark Steyn makes it clear that such attacks, not always leading to deaths, are increasingly common in Britain, I Have Seen the Future and It’s Stabbed, with two mass stabbings on the same day, with five people stabbed in Sainsbury’s parcel centre and four in an Asda supermarket, both in London Nobody died so the news didn’t travel far.
- In Germany a two-year-old boy and a man aged 41 were stabbed to death in a German park in the Bavarian city of Aschaffenburg. A 28-year-old Afghani man was arrested. He’d been due to return to Afghanistan after his claim for asylum was rejected but not before he’d been arrested three times for violent behaviour, with his last release coming after he’d received psychiatric treatment.
It’s so bad that this young Dutch woman, Eva Vlaardingerbroek, admits that she doesn’t know what to say about these attacks anymore because nothing changes (TRIGGER ALERT: according to the Dutch MSM she’s the “Shieldmaiden of the far right”)
That’s just the crimes being committed. Far worse is the response of the authorities in nations from Sweden to Britain, which is that they are siding with the Islamists.
- Salwan Momika was an immigrant to Sweden from Iraq, who had quit the Muslim faith and become and atheist. Moreover he had repeatedly burned the Qur’an in public specifically to draw attention to what he felt were the evils in the book, and to demonstrate his faith in Sweden’s laws on free speech. His new found-faith was not rewarded: the police charged Momika with “agitation against an ethnic or national group” but he never saw court because on January 29 he was shot to death. The authorities did make sure that his mate went to jail.
Oh, but it gets worse. Watch this brief street interview with a Swedish local government worker in the area. She blames Momika:
- “He lived in the wrong area.”
- “He doesn’t respect Muslims and the Quran.”
- “That’s very hard for others.”
- “We must respect Allah.”
The local Imams and Islamists must be overjoyed at such submission.
But that local government official’s response simply mirrors the Swedish government, which effectively sided with those Islamic Jihadis when it opted to hound and harass Momika instead of hailing him as a courageous defender of the freedom of expression, and providing him with full protection. He did not stoke controversy, the Muslims who raged against him, threatened to kill him, and ultimately did so are the ones who stoked the controversy.
Similarly in Britain:
- A man who burned a Koran in Manchester, UK, was immediately jailed. Rape gangsters remain free, but the guy who burned a book is already in the clink. It turns out that he burnt it because his daughter had been killed in what is delicately being called “the Israel conflict.” In other words, Hamas murdered her.
- Given that the above actions are no different to what happens in Sharia Law states, it seems that Britain will now actively enact Islamic blasphemy laws, making it a crime to “offend Muslims.”
“Angela Rayner is planning to create a council on Islamophobia and is lining up a former Tory minister to lead it”
As one commentator, David Strom said, “The original paper on which the anti-blasphemy laws are likely to be based specifically calls out people discussing the Muslim rape gangs as bigots.Having rapists roam the streets is an unfortunate fact of life, but calling them and their culture out is beyond the pale.”
Why bother? Britain’s legal system is effectively now enforcing Islamic blasphemy laws. Like Sweden and, to a lessor extent, Germany.
Naturally the current British PM, Kier Starmer, doesn’t put it like that, instead draping a nice cover over it with a beloved Lefty word, “Islamophobia”, but the contrast and counter-argument is made by none other than the Foreign Minister of the UAE, warning seven years ago about Europe creating Islamic Jihadists. I’d say the latter knows more about this than the clueless, Lefty idiot Starmer.
No Minister 
Phobia is an EXCESSIVE OR IRRATIONAL fear of something.
“ISLAMOPHOBIA” would then be an excessive or irrational fear of that religion that is not validated by any objective evidence.
While individuals should have the freedom to choose which religion they prefer and participate in its rituals, this has to be with equal respect for people with other beliefs and religious affiliations.
Freedom of religion does NOT entitle people to disregard and disobey the secular laws of the nation they reside in.
When people emigrate from Muslim countries in which the secular laws are also the Islamic ones to countries where they are not, these immigrants are obliged to adapt and “fit in” instead of trying to impose their religious laws on the “natives”.
Many of these immigrants do not accept that obligation and prefer to try to impose their religious beliefs on the rest of the citizens by all possible means, including political activism and even violence.
In so doing they create rational fear of obvious intentions to impose their religious beliefs on the people that disagree with them.
They then promote the lie that this disagreement and resistance to being “converted” is ISLAMOPHOBIA, prejudice and discrimination against them and too many other people are foolish enough to accept this deception.
In reality the “fear” of Islam is not excessive or irrational because it is based on evidence of the extreme efforts “Islamists” will resort to in order to impose their religious beliefs on the rest of the people and relace the secular laws of the nations they have immigrated to with Shariah Law.
Burning, damaging or disrespecting a religious book is not a secular crime in western nations. Burning a Bible or “sacred books” is not illegal but disrespecting a Quran results in physical retribution that is a criminal offence “the state” cannot protect people from.
Fear of reprisals also motivates government “authorities” to blame the victims of the violence instead of the perpetrators of the crimes and the Islamist activists that incite and justify the violence.
While most Muslims are reasonable decent folk, they have difficulty accepting secular laws that do not conform to Shariah Laws and thereby adapting to the culture of the nations they have immigrated to.
The culture and laws of our western civilization and nations is based on Christian, values, principles and morals that are significantly different from Islamic ones and therefore difficult for Muslim immigrants to accept and adapt to because compliance with western social, cultural and religious “norms” conflicts with their religious indoctrination.
It would be more sensible and beneficial if people who cannot accept and adapt to our Western ways did not come here and try to impose their beliefs on the “natives”.
Everyone should read the Koran and then would know and wonder why any are let into a western country because the Koran calls for the destruction of the western civilisation.