Jackson’s DNA breakdown is included in a post by John Bell over at the BBH Blog a few days ago.

For all the bllody noise Jackson makes one would think he would have at least 10%. He seems to be the wrong sort of Maori to me. Details follow here.

The case of Willie Jackson is interesting not only because of his insistence on a separate identity and separate entitlements for Maori  (“his people”) but because of the provable disparity between fact and the impression he seeks to convey. 

I have managed to find and watch again the “DNA Detective” programme Series 1, Episode 4 featuring Willie and actress Shavaughn Ruakere. 

On his father’s side, Willie’s DNA results showed his ancestry to be:

33.7%  East Asian

25% Ashkenazi (German) Jewish

18%  Other European (substantially Welsh)

2.04% Oceanian / Maori 

Interesting statements made by Willie in the course of the programme:

“A lot of it (ancestry) is anecdotal.  You don’t know what is true and what’s not.”

“I don’t get too worked up about percentages of who you are.  The reality is you are a product of your upbringing.  I am a product of my upbringing which has been 99.9% Maori”.

“I don’t see that because I have a certain amount of Jewish ancestry that should affect me in any way whatsoever.” 

I leave readers to draw their own conclusions as to what the above facts signify in terms of the current debate on ethnicity and entitlement.

John Bell’s background is:

John is a former teacher who has had a long involvement in politics and currently supports the defence of democracy and of equal rights for all.

The above is only part of John’s full post and here is a link to the rest of it. It is an informative read and the above piece on Willie Jackson is only a footnote at the end.

https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/john-bell-new-zealand-s-constitutional-crisis-where-to-for-treaty-principles