The Victorian era god-botherers really fucked up didn’t they.
Almost as much as the 21st century slime.
It’s not a “photo”, its a fucking picture incorporating a photograph of a face.
Now for a fact – whether you like it or not you won’t stop this.
Banning things never works – I expect better from ACT.
Back to the Victorians and their demands that the human body (notably that their God hand made) was somehow indecent and must be covered up at all times.
Previously, of course, clothes were for practical or decorative purposes.
The only way to stop this recent AI innovation McClure rages against causing harm of the type McClure claims will be to get the mindset to change back to that of the pre-Victorian times so little girls and boys are not shamed just because a picture resembling them is made available to their acquaintances.
If we continue this nude=bad mindset a lot of innocent children (and not a few adults) will be unnecessarily hurt.
Edification: This post is about an attitude that someone should feel shame because of someone else’s imagination (which is what a picture is).
Victim blaming if you will. An attitude that harks back to the days of Victorian era Western missionaries infesting the new world with an unnecessary prudishness.
Only someone very sick and perverted would change that meaning to be about sex – in any form.
And there it is: The most fucked up opinion I’ve ever read on the internet.
Please just do the world a favour by self immolating, or jumping feet first into a woodchipper. You nasty, sick, paedo-simping fuck.
Too busy running to offer a solution then?
I did offer a solution. Feet first into a woodchipper. Presumably this is soft legislation that doesn’t go that far.
If you ever find yourself using the same arguments as Mr Horton from the Very Special Episode of Diff’rent Strokes, where he tries to molest Arnold, you probably shouldn’t be saying them out loud, let alone publishing them on the internet.
Stay away from me, stay away from my kids, stay away from other people’s kids, stay away from other human beings.
Years ago I had to walk a young girl such a thing.
Rumours – no AI in those days.
It wasn’t the gang of girls who created the rumours that was the problem, it was the god-bothering, gutless, kiddy-fucking scum like you acting on the rumours that did the harm.
I stand by my comments and will until someone bright (ie not like you) offers me a better solution.
Tom, why is this NAMBLA shit still up?! If MT Tinman wants to exercise his free speech, he should be doing it somewhere other than No Minister, surely?
We’re a collective blog that don’t interfere with each other’s posts in any way unless asked to by the blogger, including dealing with commentators, and we’ve only had one contributor who has ever been voted “off the island” by the rest of us.