The Victorian era god-botherers really fucked up didn’t they.

Almost as much as the 21st century slime.

It’s not a “photo”, its a fucking picture incorporating a photograph of a face.

Now for a fact – whether you like it or not you won’t stop this.

Banning things never works – I expect better from ACT.

Back to the Victorians and their demands that the human body (notably that their God hand made) was somehow indecent and must be covered up at all times.

Previously, of course, clothes were for practical or decorative purposes.

The only way to stop this recent AI innovation McClure rages against causing harm of the type McClure claims will be to get the mindset to change back to that of the pre-Victorian times so little girls and boys are not shamed just because a picture resembling them is made available to their acquaintances.

If we continue this nude=bad mindset a lot of innocent children (and not a few adults) will be unnecessarily hurt.

Edification: This post is about an attitude that someone should feel shame because of someone else’s imagination (which is what a picture is).

Victim blaming if you will. An attitude that harks back to the days of Victorian era Western missionaries infesting the new world with an unnecessary prudishness.

Only someone very sick and perverted would change that meaning to be about sex – in any form.