I note the “welcome to Doris of Waltham” NZME preacher to The Village of the Damned a certain Mr McDonald is coming out to oppose the directive to allow woolen carpet to enter the tender for install in State Houses as it is too hard to Clean. As if cleaning is very high on some “Clients of State assisted Housing, lists?

There is much more to this than the bare bones back story by the repeaters” at Newstalk who are as biased against Primary production as any.

Wool has many other advantages and in the Past, inexplicably synthetics were the only option for tender with Woolen Carpet being ‘EXCLUDED” from tendering.

Wool is a sustainable product,
Wool is far greater environmentally acceptable,
With carpet Wool now costing more to harvest by shearing it is being burnt or left to rot after the necessary removal for stock health, surely its use is a plus for the environment.
Also in a surprize to many if not most had Woolen carpet not been prevented in participating at tender it would have remained hidden, it is actually more than competitive!!!

How many of the constantly offended knew that the natural sustainable product was precluded from tendering against the “Oil” based synthetic fibres for carpets, too busy chanting mindlessly against survival for Israel perhaps.

Now I have expressed previously on more than one occasion it remains a total mystery when wool is a far superior product than “Oil Based Synthetics” both as a floor covering and in Garments.