No Minister

Posts Tagged ‘Unemployment

Job Security

with 4 comments

Two examples of this.

First is total job security. I invite every socialist in the world to tell me that they deserve, that I deserve, to be paid as much money as Bob Bergen.


Second is declining job security.

This is ongoing elder abuse and his staff should be brought up on charges (and his wife and dirtbag son). If they think he needs this card and such prescriptive instructions to make a bog standard appearance then they know he’s mentally gone. If you did this to a member of your family, in most nations you’d be committing a crime.

Written by Tom Hunter

June 24, 2022 at 10:26 pm


leave a comment »

I don’t think New Zealand will have quite the same labour problems as the US has hit as we slowly (very, very, very slowly) crawl out from under the thumbs of petty little tyrants like Ashely Bloomfield, Michael Baker and Souxie Wiles to resume a normal life.

Which is to say that as the economy returns to life and jobs open up, we’ll probably be able to fill them, although there is some doubt around that given how many jobs were filled by immigrant labour and how increasingly uncompetitive we are on wages and salaries compared to Australia.

In the USA, the nation-wide issue has been having tens of millions of jobs that are simply not being filled, no matter the wages or perks being offered (free dental and health care for example) by desperate employers.

There’s really little doubt that this has been due to the very generous wage replacement money going from Uncle Sam directly into the pockets of people, courtesy of the various Covid-19 packages passed by Congress in the last two years to help out people locked out of work by government C-19 policies. Literally trillions of dollars were allocated and much (though not all) of it has been spent.

People simply did not need to work, or at a minimum, the government assistance made it irrational for them to get a job.

One of the great aspects of the USA is that it has Federal government, meaning that, with fifty states you can conduct, within the bounds of Federal law, fifty different experiments around economic measures like taxes, regulations, environmental care, healthcare and so forth.

In the case of the jobs vs. unemployed argument this Federated government has provided a powerful argument against these government measures being carried over far beyond the time when they were needed (and recall they were only needed because of other government measures):

In early 2021, Mississippi faced the worst labor shortage in state history. By late spring, the situation had only worsened. There were a record-high 84,000 jobs open throughout the state — more open jobs than people actually looking for work. There were still nearly 80,000 Mississippians collecting unemployment benefits — more than 10 times as many than before the pandemic struck. And Mississippi businesses desperately needed workers.

Colour me unsurprised. When people are paid by the government to sit at home this is what happens. Thankfully the solution was simple:

Governor Tate Reeves saw the need for swift action and, in June, Mississippi became one of the first states nationwide to opt out of these expansions and bonuses months before they were set to expire.

The results are straight out of Economics 101:

Businesses across the state hired more than 72,000 workers in the month of June alone — the largest hiring spree in state history. But it gets better. The hiring spree continued throughout the summer and fall, with more Mississippians being hired between June and September than any other four-month period on record.

Overall, the largest hiring spree ever recorded in state history resulted in more than 300,000 open jobs being filled, with nearly 11,500 jobs being filled each week.

It was also good for the taxpayers:

…taxpayers were paying roughly $38 million for unemployment benefits every week. But one week after these benefits expired, that number plummeted to under $3 million per week. Fast forward to December of 2021 and taxpayers were paying less than $600,000 per week for unemployment benefits — an overall drop of 97 percent.

Sadly I don’t think NZ’s problem will be quite so simple to solve given the Left-wing philosophy that where the State leads the rest of society will follow – in this case with massive welfare spending increases plus minimum wage increases, both of which are much harder to reverse than the US Federal assistance packages.

Written by Tom Hunter

April 5, 2022 at 4:00 pm


with 3 comments

Old saying … there are lies, damn lies and statistics.

And so it is that we are told NZL unemployment is down to 3.4% (never mind that the number of persons receiving the Jobseeker benefit currently stands at 190,000, equivalent to 6.1% of the working population, and 70,000 more than when National left office). Several weeks ago Lindsay Mitchell had a post on this regarding stats for Maori in particular:

Part of the reason for the so called fall in unemployment is that over the past two years the number of persons employed in the State sector have increased by 8,500 to 61,100 costing $30.6b in salaries and wages (to the end of June) an increase of $3.8b since 2019.

Value for money or a drag on the productive sector … guess that depends on where you sit.

Written by The Veteran

December 12, 2021 at 9:42 am

Posted in New Zealand

Tagged with

Making progress with Progressivism

with 9 comments

It’s a bog-standard feature of every Labour government that the state will expand, not just in terms of money spent, but people employed.

So I’m not surprised to see this information from a recent post by Don Brash, Do We Need So Many Bureaucrats?:

  • Land Information New Zealand, 25.5%
  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 30.7%
  • Ministry of Education, 32.4% (not teachers)
  • Ministry of Defence, 35.3%
  • Ministry of Primary Industries, 36.7%
  • Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, 38.9%
  • Oranga Tamariki, 40.7%
  • Ministry of Transport, 40.8% (not including NZTA)
  • Ministry for the Environment, 41.0%
  • Public Service Commission, 42.6%
  • Ministry for Women, 45.8%
  • Ministry for Maori Development, 69.8%
  • Ministry for Pacific Peoples, 81.1%

As Brash points out, this would not be so bad if there was evidence that the government was getting stuff done with all these extra people. But as is increasingly obvious to anybody who ignores the NZ MSM, it’s not.

A person at the polar opposite end of the political spectrum from Brash, Danyl Mclauchlan, has noticed the same thing:

Which raises an awkward question. If policy is developed by ministerial staff and implemented by DPMC, what do all of Robertson’s ministerial colleagues and their thousands of highly paid advisers do all day? Because the description of the Implementation Unit sounds an awful lot like the current role of a ministerial office.

Given Adern’s lightweight nature, it’s not surprising as to where this idea came from:

The Implementation Unit is a Blairite idea, as the Stuff journalists point out. He called it “the Delivery Unit”, inventing it in his final years in Downing Street to try and overcome what he perceived as the failure of both the civil service and his junior ministers in achieving his policy ambitions. Blair’s critics disagreed, arguing that Blair’s tendency to grandstand in the media by announcing visionary, aspirational goals without figuring out how to deliver them was the deeper problem with his administration.

Helpfully the Stuff article reminds us that Jacinda Ardern once worked for Tony Blair.

Chuckle. Danyl also takes a shot at other Lefties who have been banging the drums for a 21st century Ministry of Works, by quoting a senior government advisor that he knows:

“It’s the same mistake National made with MBIE. Let’s build a new entity to do the economic transformation the rest of the government can’t deliver. And how’d that work out? Imagine you’re a Labour minister and you decide to fund a Ministry of Works to deliver all these projects that NZTA and HUD and Kāinga Ora seem unable to do. You’re going to spend two years and, I dunno, a couple hundred million setting it up. You’re going to end up staffing it with people from NZTA and Kāinga Ora, because who else are you going to get? But once it’s built you’ve just replicated these same dysfunctional organisations. So it’s not going to build anything and your political career will be over.”

You could also add the ACT Party’s dopey idea to establish a Productivity Commission. How’d that work out?

That and the MBIE, plus all this other stuff, really go to the heart of the problem, which is not just the mindless acquisition of new bureaucrats by Labour but the fact that National and ACT refuse to shut down a lot of these useless government departments and worse, create new ones themselves. It’s Public Choice theory on steroids.

Speaking of which, let’s recall this blog’s namesake, as well as one of the key writers who seemed to well understand that theory as he wrote delicious lines like this for a show that seems ageless:

Perhaps it’ll all be okay. As I have said before, having a government that’s useless beats one that’s actually doing stupid shit. I just wish they could do all this nothing for much less money.

Besides, the new National-led coalition government of 2026 will freeze those numbers at that year’s level and hold them there until they lose power 2-3 terms later.

The idea of abolishing a bunch of these ministries, starting with the last three on that list, will be rejected as “too extreme and divisive” – plus Woman, Maori and Pasifika political activists and “journalists” who will never vote National, will tell National that they’d be awful people if they did such things.

Written by Tom Hunter

June 1, 2021 at 12:00 pm

Tucker Carlson strikes the right note

leave a comment »

Last week I made the following point about dealing with the coronavirus, COVID-19:

With regard to a recession, there will be negative life impacts resulting from an economic slowdown forced by overly-zealous containment procedures. People who lose their jobs, watch their savings evaporate, and struggle to keep their homes will suffer from anxiety and depression, and not in spikes but over time. Unemployment carries especially harsh consequences for such things, even aside from the external impacts, and the longer a person is unemployed the worse it gets. Suicide rates rise as unemployment rises and drug abuse is twice as likely as for someone with a job. Add divorce to all this as each factor feeds on the other.

So I was pleased to see Fox News’s Tucker Carlson making a similar point. Your can also read the transcript here.

Carlson’s viewpoint is well argued and well-balanced:

Our first obligation, everyone agrees, is to keep our people safe. If we can prevent Americans from getting the coronavirus, we should do that. At the same time, though, we need to protect our economy, and that is not just something that Wall Street cares about, to be totally clear.

Economic decline is dangerous for everyone, especially at the bottom of the economy. It’s a legitimate human concern. It’s not just financial, it’s about families.

People keep focusing on Wall Street, but that place is often not fully linked to the “real” economy, as was shown by the 1987 Wall Street crash, which had many people hyperventilating about the recession that would inevitably follow in 1988.

Some went further, looking at how closely Black Monday – with a 22.6% one-day drop – matched the 1929 Crash and predicting a full-blown Great Depression II.

It never happened, thanks largely to the lessons learned from 1929 as to how to keep things moving and not fall into a spiral: don’t cut government spending, don’t raise taxes, use Central Bank credit creation to allow for a temporary flood of liquidity.

By early 1988 there was no sign that the event had had much of a negative impact on the economy at all. That was not the cae in 2008 because that crash was directly linked to the problems with trading of mortgage bonds and more exotic financial instruments all directly linked to an everyday economic item: the family home.

But locking down the everyday actions of an economy is something very different to both of those events.

Here’s the problem. We’ve got two imperatives and they often conflict. So if you ask an epidemiologist what we ought to do next, the answer is simple: Shut it down. Close every public space until the virus passes. Hospitals would get a pass, of course, but restaurants, bars, hotels, movie theaters, airlines — everything.

From a public health standpoint, that makes sense. But what would be the consequences of doing that? Millions and millions of people would lose their jobs, some of them for good. We’d enter a severe recession with mass unemployment, and it could get worse from there.

You would see an awful lot of people in poverty in Middle America and that poses its own kind of public health risk. Poor countries are never healthy countries. If you want great health care, you’ve got to pay for it, and you have to have money to do so.

Thankfully most Western governments seem to understand this and have either announced or about to announce various financial support mechanisms, and although most central banks are still not back where they should be in terms of interest rates, with rates so low it’s hard to see them going lower, they will act in their classic manner of lender-of-last-resort as they did in 1987 and 2008/9.

Carlson discusses the various ideas of directly helping people:

Some of the professional class have suggested a guaranteed basic income as a response to this threat. Mitt Romney has suggested sending every American a monthly check for $1,000. That’s likely a well-meaning idea. A lot of smart people are behind it. But it’s also decadent and foolish.

Name a place that’s become happier and more prosperous under a scheme like that? Indian reservations? The inner city? Rural areas where half the male population gets monthly disability checks? Or for that matter, if we’re being honest, how many happily idle, inherited money people do you know? Rich people? None. They’re all drunk. Of course they are.

But he suggests one idea from Germany that he thinks has merit:

The German government runs a program called Kurzarbeit. It means “short time.” Employees are encouraged not to lay off their workers but instead place them on reduced hours. The government then steps in to compensate some of those missing wages to help the companies with payroll.

Now, it may cost taxpayers more than Romney’s grand a month program, but critically, it keeps people in their jobs. It’s also straightforward, unlike so many of the double-secret backward tax rebate programs the geniuses in Congress are always coming up with and telling you, you should love and be happy with. But you don’t ever understand them, and neither do they. 

And that model has some solid and recent history of success:

During the 2008 financial crisis, Germany’s economy shrank by a higher proportion than ours did in America. Yet, at the same time, Germany’s unemployment rate actually fell. Labor force participation rose.

That’s pretty damned impressive. We should try that here in New Zealand as well, crisis or no crisis.

Written by Tom Hunter

March 18, 2020 at 1:04 am


leave a comment »

talking up ‘her’ wellbeing’ budget while back here unemployment numbers rocket to 4.5%.

And all this is Labour’s own doing.   Makes a bit of a nonsense of well-being doesn’t it … how long before well-being joins Kiwiflop as something akin to scab in Labour’s lexicon?

Written by The Veteran

July 18, 2019 at 8:40 am

Posted in New Zealand

Tagged with ,


leave a comment »

The unemployment rate in the December quarter increased 0.4% to 4.3% and while one should be a little cautious in reading too much into this one quarter result the PM has really excelled herself with her throwaway comment that the additional 10,000 on the ‘dole’ did not represent any actual increase in unemployment numbers but rather comprised the already unemployed who, for what ever reason, hadn’t bothered to sign up for the dole and that getting them to do so was a success story for her government.

If you believe that then you clearly also believe that Kiwiflop is on track (subject to some ‘minor’ recalebrating) and that a 100 million trees are going to be planted this year (by Shane Jones’ cuzzie bros getting off the couch).

Brings to mind the quote from Conan O’Brien … “When all else fails there’s always delusion”.  Clearly St Jacinda takes us for fools … we’re not.   Instead she embarrasses herself and her office … yet again.

Written by The Veteran

February 10, 2019 at 9:02 am


leave a comment »

Stats NZ have reported that unemployment rose in the last quarter to 4.5% reversing five quarters of falls (with three out of the five dating from when National was in power).

Just how can that be under a Labour/NZ First government?

Hint … the removal of sanctions requiring beneficiaries to actively seek work work might have something to do with it.

It is reported today a major construction firm has gone into receivership.    Expect more of this in line with the latest ANZ Business Confidence Survey showing business confidence at a low not seen since the GFC. 

Labour/NZ First ain’t working (pun intended).  Expect the unemployment rate to rise.

Written by The Veteran

August 1, 2018 at 12:12 am

Posted in New Zealand

Tagged with